Nuclear News Hubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Nuclear Power
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Nuclear Power
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Nuclear News Hubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Nuclear Power

Opinion | A U.S.-Iran Game of Nuclear Chicken

admin by admin
August 4, 2022
in Nuclear Power


To the Editor:

Re “Iran, Digging Tunnels, Fans Nuclear Fears” (front page, June 17):

The diplomatic deadlock over Iran’s nuclear program has all the ingredients of a coming escalation. The United States and Iran, historical adversaries deeply wary of one another on the best of days, are engaged in a game of chicken. Both refuse to budge from their positions and expect the other to blink.

But neither side has a better alternative to re-entering the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement. Because of high oil prices and China’s willingness to buy its crude, Tehran may believe that it can get by if the talks collapse. But Iran can’t bank on current market dynamics holding for a long period.

The likelihood of even stronger U.S. sanctions will complicate Iran’s ability to circumvent them — and the European Union, which previously opposed Washington’s sanctions but begrudgingly went along with them, will be active participants after blaming Iran for spoiling the diplomacy.

The U.S. interest is also best served by wrapping up these negotiations successfully. The maximum pressure strategy on Iran was an indisputable failure; doubling down on it will hurt Iran’s economy but is highly unlikely to force Tehran into changing its nuclear policy.

Cyberoperations are at best short-term holding patterns, and Iran would retaliate by rebuilding and hardening its nuclear facilities. A military operation would open a Pandora’s box, increasing the risk of a war the U.S. doesn’t need.

For the U.S., the best solution is right in front of it — even if it will entail difficult trade-offs.

Daniel R. DePetris
New Rochelle, N.Y.
The writer is a fellow at Defense Priorities, a foreign policy think tank in Washington.

Banish the ‘Czar’ as a Title

To the Editor:

As a descendant of people who were persecuted by the Russian czars, do we really need to use that word when trying to confer a title or power? We’ve had Covid czars and transportation czars, to name just two. In light of the current state of the world, isn’t it time to delete that word from our lexicon of bestowed monikers?



Source link

Previous Post

I’m Worried About Ukraine, but it’s Not What You Think

Next Post

A Path from Coal to Nuclear is Being Blazed in Wyoming

Next Post

A Path from Coal to Nuclear is Being Blazed in Wyoming

Recommended

Mitsubishi Heavy, Hitachi to develop new nuclear reactor for 2030s use « nuclear-news

October 1, 2022

ExxonMobil Accurately Projected Rising Temperatures While Publicly Disparaging Climate Science

January 21, 2023

Don't miss it

News

Minnesota Needs Environmental Protections for Cumulative Impacts. Your State Does Too.

March 22, 2023
News

TODAY. Two ways of looking at the world « nuclear-news

March 22, 2023
News

Today’s Electric Vehicles Can Greatly Reduce Emissions From Driving

March 21, 2023
News

SMRs See Progress in US, Canada, & Europe

March 21, 2023
News

21 March at US Embassy , London, Crowds to protest against nuclear weapons at Suffolk airbase « nuclear-news

March 21, 2023
News

NOAA’s Spring Outlook Points to a Risky Season

March 20, 2023

© 2022 Nuclear News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • News
  • Nuclear Power
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Nuclear Power
  • Contact us

© 2022 Nuclear News Hubb All rights reserved.