Nuclear News Hubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Nuclear Power
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Nuclear Power
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Nuclear News Hubb
No Result
View All Result
Home News

A clarification about China and Taiwan « nuclear-news

admin by admin
August 5, 2022
in News


A clarification about China and Taiwan


Norman Realname, 5 Aug 22,

I’m grateful to a reader for providing this explanation.

I still think that it’s a pretty bad idea for USA and Australia to start a probable World War 3 over Taiwan.

The Republic of China (ROC) and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) are NOT synonyms and should not be used as such. The ROC has NO control over Hong Kong; it’s a semi-autonomous territory ruled by the PRC under the “one country, two systems” arrangement, as per treaty. Thus, grumbling about democratic subversion aside, there was no question of the PRC’s sovereignty over it.

The ROC, however, DOES have control over Taiwan, and the PRC does NOT. As to why this is the case, the most oversimplified answer is that the Chinese Civil War never fully ended and both governments claim to rule the territory of the other, but since the PRC has the de facto control of almost all of it, it’s recognized as the “real” China. The more complicated answer is that since democratization the ROC government no longer wants to rule the mainland and sees itself as a separate Taiwanese nation but is forbidden to relinquish its territorial claims (under threat of invasion) by the PRC who view Taiwan as integral Chinese territory and would interpret any movement away from them as secession (even though the PRC has never actually ruled over Taiwan).

The US and China differ over their interpretation of the situation. The PRC’s One China PRINCIPLE states that there is only one China, and Taiwan is a part of China. The US’s One China POLICY states that they *acknowledge* the PRC’s position on the matter, without actually saying whether or not they agree that Taiwan is part of China. In other words: the US generally agrees there is only one China, but they’re not sure (read: deliberately ambiguous) whether Taiwan is part of it.

Fundamentally, while the PRC has been successful in preventing international recognition of the ROC (Taiwan), they do not control the territory and cannot control the territory without:

1. The ROC (Taiwanese) government agreeing to hand over power peacefully to the PRC.
2. A full-scale military invasion of Taiwan aimed at the surrender and/or destruction of the ROC (Taiwanese) government.

To compare the situation to Hong Kong, – the crucial difference is the People’s Republic of China did not need to roll in their military to fight some theoretical Hong Kong military in order to be able to tell Hong Kong what to do.

Like this:

Like Loading…


August 4, 2022 –


Posted by Christina Macpherson |
politics international, Reference, Taiwan

No comments yet.



Source link

Previous Post

First Came A Mysterious Explosion, Then The Russian Denials

Next Post

Addressing nuclear weapons legacies: opportunities for states to cooperate and engage towards shared humanitarian goals

Next Post

Addressing nuclear weapons legacies: opportunities for states to cooperate and engage towards shared humanitarian goals

Recommended

Construction of Fukushima water release facilities to begin Thurs. « nuclear-news

August 4, 2022

Disinformation: A Racist Tactic, from Slave Revolts to Elections

November 4, 2022

Don't miss it

News

EPA: Don’t Delay Strong Rules to Help Prevent Chemical Disasters

June 4, 2023
Nuclear Power

U.S. Warns China on Nuclear Rivalry and Vows to Keep Patrolling Region

June 4, 2023
News

Government turns a blind eye to lessons from nuclear disaster « nuclear-news

June 4, 2023
News

OMB Proposes Science-Based Guidance for Modernizing Regulatory Review

June 3, 2023
News

INL’s Marvel Micro Reactor Prepares for Testing

June 3, 2023
Nuclear Power

U.S. Will Try to Bring China Into Arms Control Talks

June 3, 2023

© Nuclear News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • News
  • Nuclear Power
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Nuclear Power
  • Contact us

© 2022 Nuclear News Hubb All rights reserved.